| Autorius | Žinutė |
|
|
2026-07-21 11:34 #888077
1
|
|
⭐ What the Fed does when political pressure to cut rates rises
1️⃣ Cut slowly, not aggressively The Fed will begin cutting rates, but at a measured pace: 25 bps cuts spaced out heavy forward guidance “data‑dependent” language This allows the Fed to show responsiveness without losing credibility. 2️⃣ Use liquidity tools instead of rate cuts If inflation is still too high, the Fed can ease financial conditions without touching the policy rate: adjust reverse repo operations slow down QT provide liquidity via standing repo facilities tweak bank reserve requirements These tools reduce market stress without lowering rates. 3️⃣ Signal future cuts without delivering them immediately The Fed often uses communication as a tool: “We expect to cut later this year.” “Inflation is trending in the right direction.” “Policy is sufficiently restrictive.” This calms political pressure without actually cutting yet. 4️⃣ Let inflation run slightly hot This is the quiet part: The Fed tolerates inflation above 2% because it reduces real debt burdens. If political pressure rises, the Fed may allow inflation to stay in the 3–4% zone while cutting slowly. This is fiscal dominance. 5️⃣ Avoid any move that destabilizes Treasury financing The Fed will not cut so fast that: bond markets panic inflation expectations surge long‑term yields spike Treasury auctions fail Political pressure cannot override financial stability. ⭐ What the Fed will NOT do Even under political pressure, the Fed will not: slash rates aggressively cut if inflation is clearly accelerating abandon its independence repeat 1970s-style premature easing risk a bond‑market crisis The Fed remembers the 1970s mistakes. ⭐ The real constraint: debt With U.S. debt at ~120% of GDP, the Fed must: keep rates high enough to control inflation keep rates low enough to avoid exploding interest costs avoid sudden moves that destabilize Treasury markets This is why the Fed’s policy today is gradual, careful, and liquidity‑focused. ⭐ Final synthesis If political pressure to cut rates rises, the Fed will: cut slowly use liquidity tools rely on communication tolerate slightly higher inflation avoid destabilizing Treasury financing The Fed will not aggressively cut unless inflation is clearly under control. |
|
|
|
2026-07-21 11:34 #888078 |
|
⭐ What the Fed does when political pressure to cut rates rises
1️⃣ Cut slowly, not aggressively The Fed will begin cutting rates, but at a measured pace: 25 bps cuts spaced out heavy forward guidance “data‑dependent” language This allows the Fed to show responsiveness without losing credibility. 2️⃣ Use liquidity tools instead of rate cuts If inflation is still too high, the Fed can ease financial conditions without touching the policy rate: adjust reverse repo operations slow down QT provide liquidity via standing repo facilities tweak bank reserve requirements These tools reduce market stress without lowering rates. 3️⃣ Signal future cuts without delivering them immediately The Fed often uses communication as a tool: “We expect to cut later this year.” “Inflation is trending in the right direction.” “Policy is sufficiently restrictive.” This calms political pressure without actually cutting yet. 4️⃣ Let inflation run slightly hot This is the quiet part: The Fed tolerates inflation above 2% because it reduces real debt burdens. If political pressure rises, the Fed may allow inflation to stay in the 3–4% zone while cutting slowly. This is fiscal dominance. 5️⃣ Avoid any move that destabilizes Treasury financing The Fed will not cut so fast that: bond markets panic inflation expectations surge long‑term yields spike Treasury auctions fail Political pressure cannot override financial stability. ⭐ What the Fed will NOT do Even under political pressure, the Fed will not: slash rates aggressively cut if inflation is clearly accelerating abandon its independence repeat 1970s-style premature easing risk a bond‑market crisis The Fed remembers the 1970s mistakes. ⭐ The real constraint: debt With U.S. debt at ~120% of GDP, the Fed must: keep rates high enough to control inflation keep rates low enough to avoid exploding interest costs avoid sudden moves that destabilize Treasury markets This is why the Fed’s policy today is gradual, careful, and liquidity‑focused. ⭐ Final synthesis If political pressure to cut rates rises, the Fed will: cut slowly use liquidity tools rely on communication tolerate slightly higher inflation avoid destabilizing Treasury financing The Fed will not aggressively cut unless inflation is clearly under control. |
|
|
|
2026-07-21 11:45 #888085
1
|
|
Bet realybe ta kad siandien policy direction monetariniams metalams po barabanu.
⭐ Why gold benefits either way the Fed moves 1️⃣ If the Fed cuts rates Rate cuts reduce real yields and weaken the dollar. Gold loves that. Cuts usually mean: inflation still elevated financial stress rising political pressure increasing debt service costs too high liquidity returning to markets This creates: lower real yields → bullish gold weaker USD → bullish gold more liquidity → bullish gold Gold historically rallies during easing cycles. 2️⃣ If the Fed keeps rates high High rates crush the economy, raise debt‑service costs, and increase recession risk. Gold loves that too. High rates mean: recession probability rises credit stress increases Treasury funding pressure grows banks tighten lending markets fear a policy mistake This creates: safe‑haven demand → bullish gold negative lived real yields → bullish gold fiscal dominance → bullish gold Gold historically rallies during high‑rate stress periods. 3️⃣ If the Fed raises rates again Even rate hikes don’t hurt gold in today’s environment because: inflation is sticky real yields remain negative in lived terms debt is too high for aggressive tightening hikes increase recession risk hikes increase Treasury interest burden hikes increase systemic fragility Gold thrives when: inflation > nominal rates debt is high policy is constrained markets fear breakage All true today. ⭐ The deeper reason: fiscal dominance This is the real driver. Fiscal dominance means: The Fed cannot tighten aggressively because doing so destabilizes government finances. When debt is ~120% of GDP: rates cannot rise too high inflation cannot be crushed real yields cannot stay positive liquidity cannot be withdrawn too fast Gold thrives in fiscal dominance because: inflation stays above target real yields stay suppressed currency credibility erodes debt is inflated away central banks accumulate gold This is why gold has been rising even with high rates. ⭐ The “no bad scenario” setup for gold Gold benefits from: rate cuts → lower real yields rate hikes → recession risk high rates → fiscal stress sticky inflation → negative real yields geopolitical risk → safe‑haven flows energy underinvestment → inflation pressure deglobalisation → supply shocks central bank gold buying → structural demand There is no Fed path that removes these drivers. ⭐ Final synthesis Yes — the current macro environment is structurally supportive for gold regardless of what the Fed does: If the Fed cuts → gold rises. If the Fed holds → gold rises. If the Fed hikes → gold rises. Because the underlying forces — high debt, fiscal dominance, sticky inflation, negative real yields, geopolitical fragmentation, and central‑bank gold accumulation — are bigger than rate policy. |
|
|
|
2026-07-21 21:00 #888196 |
|
Krosneles.eu [2026-07-20 22:00]: Manau nereiks 10m, gal 2-3 užteks. FED naujas vadas pasakė, kad labai kovos su infliacija, tai sumažėjo aukso/sidabro kainos. Apsi$iks. Spausdins pinigus ir kovos su infliacija. As greiciau tapsiu Anglijos karalium nei jie pasieks savo paciu uzsibrezta 2% targeta. if you fail to plan, you plan to fail
The Undercover Economist |
|
|
|
2026-07-21 21:12 #888199 |
|
Grand [2026-07-21 21:00]: Krosneles.eu [2026-07-20 22:00]: Manau nereiks 10m, gal 2-3 užteks. FED naujas vadas pasakė, kad labai kovos su infliacija, tai sumažėjo aukso/sidabro kainos. Apsi$iks. Spausdins pinigus ir kovos su infliacija. As greiciau tapsiu Anglijos karalium nei jie pasieks savo paciu uzsibrezta 2% targeta. Šiai dienai infliacija JAV 10-13 proc metinė. Kaip pas jus UK - nežinau. Parašyk idomumo dėlei. Bet LT minimali alga bus keliama 8 proc kitąmet. |
|
|
|
2026-07-21 21:31 #888205 |
|
Nezinau, ka jie sako yra melas. Siaip kainos kyla po 7%/metus. Bilietai, transportas, maistas ir pan.
Algas kelia berods po 4-5% The Consumer Prices Index (CPI) rose by 2.8% in the 12 months to May 2026, unchanged from the 12 months to April. https://www.ons.gov.uk if you fail to plan, you plan to fail
The Undercover Economist |
|
|
|
2026-07-21 21:34 #888206 |
|
Grand [2026-07-21 21:00]: jie pasieks savo paciu uzsibrezta 2% targeta. Jie nenori 2% Tai butu blogai skolos devalvacijai, per 10 metu tik 20% nusirasytu. Islaikys 4-5% metiniu (real 10-12%) ir po 10 metu dabartine skola bus praktiskai nurasyta. Pridekim ta fakta kad naujos emisijos leidziamos irgi dideliu tempu, tai leis gyvent tokiu pat tempu ir tokia pacia fiskaline drausme(arba jos nebuvimu) visa ateinanti desimtmeti praktiskai nieko nesugriaunant ir nesulauzant. Leta zema infliacija yra nuostabus dalykas siam reikalui. Visi laukia crasho kad skolos problema butu ispresta greitai ir drastiskai, bet vargu ar sulauks-dabartiniai protai ismoko praeities pamokas ir atrado nauju toolsu kaip galima valdyt situacija per leta siek tiek didesne nei praeities infliacija. Populiacijai tai yra dar naujas dalykas ir visi dar prisimena nuliniu palukanu era, del to Auksas ner placiai adoptintas. Bet bus.Vieninteliai kas supranta ir ruosiasi siandien yra Centriniai Bankai. |
|
|
|
2026-07-21 21:35 #888207 |
|
Nu tai reiškia infliacija apie 10 proc visame pasaulyje.
Imigrantai uzbekai jau Baltarusijoje po 700usd gauna. Net ir Baltarusijoje jau infliacija |
|
|
|
2026-07-21 21:37 #888208 |
|
Tai kam jie ta 2% targeta laiko? Pusgalviai arba melagiai, bet tu visada bandai isvartyti kokie jie visi protingi.
if you fail to plan, you plan to fail
The Undercover Economist |
|
|
|
2026-07-21 21:38 #888209 |
|
2026 infliacija siek tik aprimo, ka ir rodo aukso judejimas. Labai lengva sekti realia infliacija per maisto kainas supermarkete, puikiai koreliuoja su aukso dinamika.
2025 buvo wild-atrode kad kasdien kai tik eini i parduotuve vis naujos kainos. Dabar pastebiu stabilizacija. |
|
|
|
2026-07-21 21:41 #888210 |
|
Grand [2026-07-21 21:37]: Tai kam jie ta 2% targeta laiko? Tam paciam tikslui kaip ir oficialia infliacija-kad masems situacija atrodytu svelnesne. Jei oficialia prilygintu realiai 10%, kiltu panic buying kas iskart ispustu burbulus realiuose daiktuose. |
|
|
|
00:45 #888391 |
|
Silver 300 per ateinancius 10 metu, konservatyviai taip. Aiskus secular bulius eina, Impulsinis nuo 2020, ir tiketis 10 metu korekcijos dabar kaip kolega C implyina yra nerealu sioj vietoj. Metai/du trajektorijos nesugadintu.
|
|
|
|
01:18 #888394 |
|
Koks targetas siu metu pabaigai tavo manymu?
if you fail to plan, you plan to fail
The Undercover Economist |
|
|
|
01:19 #888395 |
|
Esmė yra infliacijoje ir visi metalai eis į viršų, bus 100 ar 300, o gal ir 1000 bus tik neaišku kada. Viskas priklauso nuo pinigų emisijos.
Anekdotas šia tema: Nilijardierius norėjo pamatyti ateitį ir nusprendė 20 metų pabūti užšaldytas. Po 20m atšildė žmogų. Jis prabudęs klausia gydytojų: - ar aš vis dar milijardierius? Gydytojai :- Taip, jūs dar milijardierius, turite milijardą. Milijardierius:- O ką galima nupirkti už milijardą? Gydytojai:- Kavos puodelį. |
|
|
|
01:20 #888396 |
|
Grand [2026-07-23 01:18]: Koks targetas siu metu pabaigai tavo manymu? Rytoj pamatysime kiek šoks po EU posėdžio, kai palūkanų nepakels. |
|
Norėdami rašyti forume, turite užsiregistruoti, o jei jau registravotės- prisijungti.


1


