1. Rusija niekada nebus musulmoniška ir dėl to kaltas Samarkando valdovas Timūras (Tamerlanas), sugriovęs Aukso Ordą dar gerokai prieš Liublino uniją.

2. Jeigu tau indėniškų šalių ispanakalbiai yra vakariečiai, nu tai kąžinau.

Atskleisk paslaptį: gal esi jėzuitas iš pašaukimo???? Nes varai išvedžiojimus ir pritempinėjimus taip, kad pats Ignacas Lojola patenkintas rūko kamputyjr - velniškai gerą sėklą pasėjo gūdžioje renesanso pabaigoje.

kurmeli suprantu tau skauda,bet ivanuskos tirpsta parashkoj kaip baltas sniegas,o musulmonu daugeja sparciai,tiesa musulmonai turi konkurentus parashkoj tai siauraakius

tu kurmeli jahovos liudytojau, niekada nesuprasi ateisto

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7229705/1-250-mile-road-approved-Russia-linking-Europe-China.html

Normaliai taip privatus kelias

https://www.15min.lt/m/id/verslas/bendroves/vokietijoje-ispardavimu-diena-streikavo-amazon-darbuotojai-663-1174480

Vokietijoje išpardavimų dieną streikavo „Amazon“ darbuotojai

Šaunuoliai vokietukai, neleidžia korporacijoms išsikalinėti.
Be to, jie turi svertus, neleidžiančius išsikalinėti ir profsąjungoms, ir ligonių kasoms, ir pramonininkams, ir proletarams, ir net Briuselio klerkams. Visa tai vadinama vieninga visuomene.

Ray Dalio apie kylancia Kinija

Nerodo tavo video.

va nuoroda
https://youtu.be/Mh0vEaac78U

OPEC kartelis pamažu praranda įtaką naftos rinkai
https://www.vz.lt/rinkos/2019/08/23/opec-kartelis-pamazu-praranda-itaka-naftos-rinkai

Ir tai yra labai gerai. Arabai mažiau išsikalinės.

Tu ka jie skolu prisieme desimtim milijardu, kad plest gavyba, nes pinigu jau neuztenka issilaikyt, o cia reiks mokescius ivest ar ka

Pinigų spausdinimas užuot skatinęs ekonomiką ją destabilizuoja.

Pinigų spausdinimas sukelia vis didesnę socialinę atskirtį, nes galiausiai visi atspausdinami pinigai atsiduria 10% "mokančių uždirbti pinigus" gopšių rankose.

socialinę atskirtį sukure valdzios ,nereguliuodamos gopsumo.Sveika, kad zmones uzdirba labai daug.Tai progresas.Bet apsurdas, kada tirtingiausi sumoka maziausiai mokesciu.

Speju jeigu tu butum vienas is ju, tai butum tuom patenkintas....

Absurdas. Bet taip pat neišvengiama kaip sniegas Antarktidoje

pavarė britų CB vadas, net žagtelėjau:



ir cia dar :



bloomberg info:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-08-23/carney-urges-libra-like-reserve-currency-to-end-dollar-dominance

siaip tai cia forumas skirtas diskutuoti ekonomikos ir investiciju temomis, jei tau norisi izeidineti zmones, tai cia ne pataikei.

ir dar tavo demesiui: tavo posto print screen padarytas, dar vienas izeidimas ar najezdas tautine tema - bendrausi su policija.

Apie rizikas, kurios dar neivertintos US stockuose:


Risk #1: Concentration of Power and the Risk of Regulation

One risk I'm watching more closely is the concentration of power - and market capitalization - in just a handful of technology names. Within the technology sector alone, Microsoft, Apple, Google, Amazon, and Facebook comprise about 50% of the entire sector's market capitalization. Those five companies also make up about a quarter of the entire U.S. stock market.2

The last time that technology companies held so much clout in the stock market was, you guessed it, during the tech bubble in 2000. Back then, technology companies made up about one-third of the entire U.S. stock market, and most readers can remember what happened when investors bid-up valuations far too high.

In the current cycle, I would argue that the problem isn't that valuations are too high or that the biggest technology companies do not have stable, solid earnings - they are very profitable enterprises and investors can make a good case to pay-up for future earnings.

I would argue, however, that with so much market share concentrated in the hands of just five companies, the risk of regulation looms larger and has potentially bigger consequences on earnings than most market observers are acknowledging.

To date, making the case for more regulation on technology has been difficult. Many of the biggest technology companies either offer free services or are selling goods whose prices remain competitive. Old antitrust laws focused on preventing companies from growing so big that they could control pricing power and remove competition. Today, even as technology companies have gotten bigger, the hardware, software, and services have gotten better, and no one is complaining about price.

But even as consumers enjoy free services and improving products, there has been growing skepticism about other ways tech companies make money: by collecting data on your daily activity, interests, and even movements. In the modern economy, data is currency, and technology companies have scores of it (often unbeknownst to the consumer).

Regulation seems inevitable, and it's actually one of those rare areas in politics with bi-partisan support. Overseas, Europe has already taken formidable regulatory action with the enactment of the General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR. GDPR covers everything from giving users much more control over their personal data, to setting standards for how corporations can collect and use user data, to setting fines for tech companies in violation of the laws (already in the hundreds of millions). It may also provide a template for future U.S. law.

Risk #2: Sustained Weakness in the Cass Freight Shipments Index

The Cass Freight Shipments Index3 is one of those little known leading indicators that has historically been pretty good at predicting economic contractions. After all, tracking how much freight is moving across the country and across the world should offer good insight into demand trends across the global economy.

In December 2018, the index turned negative for the first time in 24 months, and has posted negative readings in every month since. At issue, too, is that the negative readings are fairly sizable: -6.0% in May, -5.3% in June, -5.9% in July.4 The last time the Cass Freight Shipments Index had sustained negative readings was in 2015, which many readers may remember was a flat year for the S&P 500.5 Shipments rebounded in 2016 (as did the stock market), but with the economy currently mired in a trade war during an economic cycle that is arguable stretched, it will be important to watch how shipments shape up in the back half of the year.

Risk #3: Risky Mortgages are Back in Large Numbers

The abundance of subprime mortgages and their inclusion into risky derivative products were at the root of the 2008 Financial Crisis. In short, banks were taking excess risk on borrowers with low income and poor credit, then hedging their risk through derivative collateralized debt obligations.

The subprime loans of 2007 are now referred to as "non-qualified" or non-QM loans, but they are just as abundant - and growing. Borrowers took out $45 billion in non-QM loans in 2018, which is the highest number seen since just before the crisis in 2008. The numbers are growing. In Q1 2019, $2.5 billion worth of non-QM loans were issued, which is more than double the figure for Q1 2018 and marks the highest level of issuance since the end of 2007.6 To be fair, the biggest banks are shunning most of this loan business, leaving it to non-bank lenders. But this is still a trend worth watching.

Juostelinis georgijus.
https://lt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galvin%C4%97_ut%C4%97l%C4%97 )

Forume karaliauja Rasyja....


Eta eta... nupione-ne.tttt.

Nipanimuuuuu.muuuu...

Bee...