Yep. Ten eur/usd meškų arba bakso bulių targetai einant i nfp. Buvo. O išmaudymas matėsi bondų rinkoje.

Dar gerai , kad matesi. O ar uzdirbai ? Sutinku , kad kazkas cia kazkiek meluoja. Matyt doleriui teks pasitempti. Nu, matysim sekancia savaite.

Yep. Matėsi tai nuo valentinkės, o longendas (20y+) nuo mėnesio pradžios. Aš juos ir pirkaliojau, berods rašiau čia, ir tebeturiu, bet taip sakant, kol nepafiksuota, tol ne pelnas ane??

Jo, versis dabar, kažkiek. Bus matyt kitą sav.

bet užtai neteks už SPWR uždegt, o tai jau gerai pas mane imta INTC prie 25, tfu tfu...

Tai jei neišpurtys manęs SL ir šitas lygis laikys, tai atiduosiu LAC prie 30usd. Nu plius minus. Ir tai nepažadu, kad tiek lauksiu

Ko gero krisim toliau.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xcZ5q9FOdWQ

kaip ten reikalai su wells fargo ? daugybe nusiskundimu kad balancas stovi nuliuj ?

Tai LAC šiandien atlaikė visai neblogai, sėdiim pliuse, nors ir nelabai ant gero vakarėlio patrauktų, bet visvien ne raudonoj zonoj. Toliau tai jei pirmadienį pradės judėt į viršų, tai galima bus perkėlinėt SL aukščiau, bet labai volatili pozicija - gali išmušt kaip nieko per keliolika centų per kelias minutes. Žodžiu einam ilsėtis. Gero visiems savaitgalio.

Ai, nu ir dabar jau rečiau rašysiu apie savo veiksmus, nes kažkaip nejauku darosi su savim praktiškai bendraut, kai niekas daugiau nesidalina judesiu

Gal kiti mažai dalijasi, bet koks pusšimtis jūsų komentarus tyliai paskaito

Kalifornijos priežiūros institucija paskelbė Silicio slėnio banko (SVB), 16-ojo pagal dydį JAV banko, bankrotą. Kreditavimo įstaiga daugiausia dėmesio skyrė startuoliams (pradedančiosioms įmonėms). 2022 m. pabaigoje 89% indėlių – apie 175 mlrd. dolerių – buvo neapdrausti. „SVB” bankrotas buvo didžiausias nuo 2008 m. krizės, o bankas tapo antru pagal dydį bankrutuojančiu banku JAV istorijoje po „Washington Mutual Bank”.


https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/global-markets-banks-wrapup-1-2023-03-10/

https://apnews.com/article/svb-fed-bonds-rates-banks-inflation-a24b28b3caeede91c76cd120aa9b7966

Kaip manot neivyks domino efektas.

Manau kad jie ne vieninteliai uzsipirke obligaciju kuriu pajemingumas buvo zemas, laukime tesinio, o del domino efekto, https://www.cnbc.com/2023/03/10/roku-says-26percent-cash-reserves-stuck-in-silicon-valley-bank.html, raku ten sumaste palaikyti pinigeliu , tai nuostoliu isvengti tikrai nepavyks visiem, klausimas kiek dar tokiu yra...

Mintis tame, kad ir aš norėčiau paskaityti...Nes USA rinkoj tai su savo pinigais mes nieko nepaįtakosim - kaip tik smagu būtų nuplėšt banką, jei kur pasitaikytų proga.

https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/ceo-failed-silicon-valley-bank-no-longer-director-sf-fed-2023-03-10/ Ryskeja ir dar idomesniu detaliu san francisko fed reservu dirikas buvo svb ceo

https://www.reuters.com/business/crypto-firm-circle-reveals-33-bln-exposure-silicon-valley-bank-2023-03-11/?taid=640c595927e6b00001499dc0&utm_campaign=trueAnthem:+Trending+Content&utm_medium=trueAnthem&utm_source=twitter dar vienas veikejas imerkes i svb 3.3 milijardo is turimu savo 40

o sis reikalas su moodey's labai jau primena lehman ir bearsterans 2008 atveji kai iki zlugimo bankas vertinamas dar bbb2 o zlugus keiciamas i c (https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/moodys-downgrades-credit-ratings-silicon-valley-bank-svb-financial-2023-03-11/) .

bill ackmano twettas šiandien tiesiog paliksiu jį čia.
The gov’t has about 48 hours to fix a-soon-to-be-irreversible mistake. By allowing
@SVB_Financial
to fail without protecting all depositors, the world has woken up to what an uninsured deposit is — an unsecured illiquid claim on a failed bank. Absent
@jpmorgan

@citi
or
@BankofAmerica
acquiring SVB before the open on Monday, a prospect I believe to be unlikely, or the gov’t guaranteeing all of SVB’s deposits, the giant sucking sound you will hear will be the withdrawal of substantially all uninsured deposits from all but the ‘systemically important banks’ (SIBs). These funds will be transferred to the SIBs, US Treasury (UST) money market funds and short-term UST. There is already pressure to transfer cash to short-term UST and UST money market accounts due to the substantially higher yields available on risk-free UST vs. bank deposits. These withdrawals will drain liquidity from community, regional and other banks and begin the destruction of these important institutions. The increased demand for short-term UST will drive short rates lower complicating the
@federalreserve
’s efforts to raise rates to slow the economy. Already thousands of the fastest growing, most innovative venture-backed companies in the U.S. will begin to fail to make payroll next week. Had the gov’t stepped in on Friday to guarantee SVB’s deposits (in exchange for penny warrants which would have wiped out the substantial majority of its equity value) this could have been avoided and SVB’s 40-year franchise value could have been preserved and transferred to a new owner in exchange for an equity injection. We would have been open to participating. This approach would have minimized the risk of any gov’t losses, and created the potential for substantial profits from the rescue. Instead, I think it is now unlikely any buyer will emerge to acquire the failed bank. The gov’t’s approach has guaranteed that more risk will be concentrated in the SIBs at the expense of other banks, which itself creates more systemic risk. For those who make the case that depositors be damned as it would create moral hazard to save them, consider the feasibility of a world where each depositor must do their own credit assessment of the bank they choose to bank with. I am a pretty sophisticated financial analyst and I find most banks to be a black box despite the 1,000s of pages of
@SECGov
filings available on each bank. SVB’s senior management made a basic mistake. They invested short-term deposits in longer-term, fixed-rate assets. Thereafter short-term rates went up and a bank run ensued. Senior management screwed up and they should lose their jobs. The
@FDICgov
and OCC also screwed up. It is their job to monitor our banking system for risk and SVB should have been high on their watch list with more than $200B of assets and $170B of deposits from business borrowers in effectively the same industry. The FDIC’s and OCC’s failure to do their jobs should not be allowed to cause the destruction of 1,000s of our nation’s highest potential and highest growth businesses (and the resulting losses of 10s of 1,000s of jobs for some of our most talented younger generation) while also permanently impairing our community and regional banks’ access to low-cost deposits. This administration is particularly opposed to concentrations of power. Ironically, its approach to SVB’s failure guarantees duopolistic banking risk concentration in a handful of SIBs. My back-of-the envelope review of SVB’s balance sheet suggests that even in a liquidation, depositors should eventually get back about 98% of their deposits, but eventually is too long when you have payroll to meet next week. So even without assigning any franchise value to SVB, the cost of a gov’t guarantee of SVB deposits would be minimal. On the other hand, the unintended consequences of the gov’t’s failure to guarantee SVB deposits are vast and profound and need to be considered and addressed before Monday. Otherwise, watch out below.

Nieko baisaus cia neivyko, kol bankas ieskojo papildomo kapitalo, kai kurie klientai “iscashino” savo saskaitas ….. iki banko bankroto!
Dideliu banku akcijos vos pakrito, o Chase net atsoko penktadieni.

https://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory/banks-feel-sting-fed-fight-inflation-97767803

Silicon Valley Bank shut down, marking second-largest bank collapse in U.S. history

Chebra, sistema braska? Nezinau kaip cia bus su palukanom, nezinau. Tranzitorinis pakelimas gresia.

svb 2.7% depozitu apdrausti.

Ar tik nereiks paleisti spausdinimo preso, kad atspausdinti likusius 97%, nes kitaip sistema gali pradeti byreti kaip kortu namelis?...

Silicon Valley Bank Seized by Regulators After Run by Depositors

-Noreciau atsiimti savo pinigelius. Aciu.
-Atsiprasome, bet mes neturime jusu pinigeliu, jie skaitmeniniam pavidale, tik 3% visi pinigeliu yra isspausdinti?
-Kaip cia taip? Kokia cia konspiracija?

Visos sumos yra apdraustos iki $250K(ten yra ir tie 97%), neapdraustos - tik virs $250k.
Jo, palukanas gali pristabdyti.

prikolas tas kad iki 250 tas bankas turejo 2,7 procento o visa likusi "sklatke" virs 250k tai jo yra ko bijotis siek tiek kai per visa penktadieni neatsirado norintysis perimti dar ir siaip darbo valandom bankas shutdown itin retas reikalas.