Autorius | Žinutė |
2015-10-31 15:56 #452952 3 | |
Rusai bombina gyvenamuosius kvartalus:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=5&v=e3fYKs_sx7Y Parshiukas 1[2016-03-11 02:27]:the currency has lost 350% of its value,
augissss 2020-05-03 13:07As jau senas ir suvaikejas,todel skaiciuoju kitaip |
|
2015-10-31 17:31 #452959 | |
artas71 [2015-10-31 15:56]: Rusai bombina gyvenamuosius kvartalus: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=5&v=e3fYKs_sx7Y Nu nieko sau - video irasas apie istaskytus civilius ir jau 2 minusai Nei vienos raudos apie mirnoje nasilenije ))) |
|
2015-10-31 18:18 #452969 | |
artas71 [2015-10-31 13:56]: Rusai bombina gyvenamuosius kvartalus: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=5&v=e3fYKs_sx7Y "Это не мы" - лозунг руссо-фашистких войск Learning often consists of learning what not to learn.
|
|
2015-10-31 18:23 #452970 | |
artas71,pagal minusus atrodytu,kad tas bombinimas tavo darbas
|
|
2015-11-06 08:32 #453581 | |
Perkama prieštankinė ginkluotė – turime kontraktą su amerikiečiais dėl raketų „Javelin“. Dalis jų jau irgi pasiekė Lietuvą. Kitąmet gausime dar vieną šių raketų partiją, 2017 m. - dar vieną. Tokiu būdu būsime visiškai apsirūpinę trumpo nuotolio prieštankine ginkluote.
Skaitykite daugiau: http://www.delfi.lt/news/daily/lithuania/kariuomenes-vadas-j-v-zukas-orientuojames-i-laiko-laimejima-kad-spetu-ateiti-sajungininkai.d?id=69465574 www.patreon.com/Sausuolis
www.contribee.com/sausuolis youtube: @Sausuolis fb: https://www.facebook.com/Sausuolisblogaslt |
|
2015-11-06 08:42 #453582 1 | |
O ne pigiau būtų oficialiai pasirašyti ir atsiduoti JAV tampant 51-a valstija? Už NATO mokėk, už ginklus mokėk, visokiems Vizentaliams mokėk... Gal bent degalai atpigs.
P.S. *CENZŪRA* Redaguota: maxa (2015-11-06 12:03 ) |
|
2015-11-09 03:31 #453782 | |
http://www.infowars.com/legendary-us-army-commander-says-russia-would-annihilate-us-in-head-to-head-battle/
But not everyone is convinced. “This Stryker parade won’t fool anyone in Moscow,” says retired Army Colonel Douglas Macgregor. “The Russians don’t do many things well, but they have been subverting, destabilizing, invading and conquering their neighbors since Peter the Great. And what’s our response: a small unit of light armored trucks.” Viewed by many of his colleagues as one of the most innovative Army officers of his generation, Macgregor, a West Point graduate with a Ph.D. in international relations (“he can be pretty gruff,” a fellow West Point graduate says, “but he’s brilliant”), led the 2nd Cav’s “Cougar Squadron” in the best-known battle of Operation Desert Storm in February 1991. In 23 minutes, Macgregor’s force destroyed an entire Iraqi Armored Brigade (including nearly 70 Iraqi armored vehicles), while suffering a single American casualty. Speaking at a military “lessons learned” conference one year later, Air Force General Jack Welsh described the Battle of 73 Easting (named for a map coordinate) as “a stunning, overwhelming victory.” In the wake of the battle, however, Macgregor calculated that if his unit had fought a highly trained and better armed enemy, like the Russians, the outcome would have been different. For Johnson, “fighting their weapons” means countering not just military formations, but sophisticated air defenses, ballistic missiles, and special operations forces” — things the Russians are good at. “It’s a new battlefield,” he concludes, “in which nothing survives that flies under 25,000 feet.” n early September he circulated a PowerPoint presentation showing that in a head-to-head confrontation pitting the equivalent of a U.S. armored division against a likely Russian adversary, the U.S. division would be defeated. “Defeated isn’t the right word,” Macgregor told me last week. “The right word is annihilated.” The bottom line here is that increasing the Russian threat is a good strategy to increase the USA Army budget. |
|
2015-11-09 04:26 #453783 | |
http://www.valuewalk.com/2015/11/is-u-s-preparing-for-world-war-3/?ref=yfp
On Tuesday there were three congressional hearings which showed how far advanced these preparations are. The Senate Armed Services Committee held a hearing on cyberwarfare, a subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committee discussed the US aircraft carrier fleet and another talked about the modernization of U.S. nuclear weapons. There were no discussion of the implications of World War 3, only plans for how the U.S. could prevail. As such, the idea of World War 3 is being normalized in the minds of policy planners. At each of the hearings a conflict between major world powers was discussed in a short time frame. War is predicted to occur in a matter of years rather than decades, and it will be with other nation-states rather than terrorist groups. The hearings were devoted to working out which technologies, assets and human resources the U.S. needs to win such a war, and the acceptance of inevitable conflict was evident among Democrats as well as Republicans. However there remain a number of problems for politicians to resolve. One issue is the declining economic power of the U.S. compared to its rivals, and the increasing divisions in U.S. society as the working class and the young become more isolated. In discussions about aircraft carriers a top Navy admiral bemoaned the fact that the U.S. had only 11 colossal aircraft carriers rather than the 21 it really needs to confront the multiple challenges the country faces. However maintaining a fleet of such a size would bankrupt a country even with far more resources than the U.S. Such widespread opposition to World War 3 would put the cohesion of U.S. society to the test, even though repressive police powers would probably be increased. The U.S. ruling elite must surely be worried that the political impact of World War 3 could bring the established system crashing down around their ears. |
|
2015-11-09 16:55 #453828 2 | |
Reikėtų rodyti mokiniams ir ne tik (M.Starkaus ir J.Banio filmas):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGK9CzsEWcw www.patreon.com/Sausuolis
www.contribee.com/sausuolis youtube: @Sausuolis fb: https://www.facebook.com/Sausuolisblogaslt |
|
2015-11-10 00:00 #453838 3 | |
http://www.infowars.com/france-targets-syrian-infrastructure/
The US agenda behind destroying Syria’s pipelines has very little to do with ISIS oil profits, and far more to do with destroying Syria’s oil infrastructure.” In mid-October the U.S. targeted the Syrian electrical grid when it conducted airstrikes against two power plants under the control of ISIS in the al-Rudwaniya area to the east of Aleppo. Following the attack on the 1,000 megawatt thermal plant, the U.S. coalition attacked civilian infrastructure in Mare’a, Tal Sha’er, and al-Bab in the Aleppo countryside. The Syrian government and ISIS have an informal agreement “of understanding [that] pertains to the division of the electricity supply between the parties, whereby ISIS will receive 60% of the quota and the Syrian regime will receive 40%.” “The electricity generation and distribution system is civil infrastructure. It is used and useful to everyone no matter what side of the conflict,” the blog Moon of Alabama noted on October 19. Targeting civilian infrastructure is a preferred tactic used by the United States. In Libya, NATO bombed the country’s irrigation system. The system transported water from aquifers beneath Libya’s southern desert to about 70% of the population. The military targeting of civilian infrastructure, especially of water supplies, is a war crime under the Geneva Conventions. During the invasion of Iraq in 1991, the U.S. military targeted the civilian electrical power generation system. The damaged power infrastructure was re-targeted during the 2003 invasion. In addition to the electrical system in Iraq, the U.S targeted telephone and radio exchanges, relay stations, towers and transmission facilities, food processing, storage and distribution facilities and markets, railroad transportation facilities, bus depots, bridges, highway overpasses, highways, sewage treatment and disposal systems and even historical markers and ancient sites. In 2001 Thomas J. Nagy “discovered documents of the Defense Intelligence Agency proving beyond a doubt that, contrary to the Geneva Convention, the U.S. government intentionally used sanctions against Iraq to degrade the country’s water supply after the Gulf War. The United States knew the cost that civilian Iraqis, mostly children, would pay, and it went ahead anyway.” NATO and the U.S. replicated this pattern during the bombardment of the former Yugoslavia. During the campaign, NATO bombed hospitals, schools, daycare centers, food warehouses, civilian homes, and world cultural heritage sites, including churches and monasteries. |
|
2015-11-12 12:39 #454109 4 | |
http://www.delfi.lt/news/daily/world/ukrainoje-atsinaujina-kovos.d?id=69551344
juk nesunku nueit i OSCE ir paskaityt ka jie raso. o raso kad ukrainos "kariai" apsaudo o ne separatistai. Ko reikia, kad butu pratestos sankcijos Rusijai?Teisingai- reikia atnaujinti konflikta Donbase. Iki gruodžio 18 tuoj bus lavonėlių... |
|
2015-11-12 15:46 #454146 | |
Parshiuk, is infowars.com ir panasiu portalu, caro paliepimu, dedi linkus, cituoji, paboldini ka reikia. O kai apie OSCE, tai "nueik i OSCE ir paskaityk".
Ramybės, tiktai ramybės
|
|
2015-11-12 23:59 #454185 1 | |
ISIS paskelbė, kad nužudys visus rusus, moteris jų pavers meilužėm o vaikus vergais:
http://heavy.com/news/2015/11/new-isis-islamic-state-news-videos-pictures-russia-threat-threatens-soon-very-soon-the-blood-will-spill-like-an-ocean-domestic-terrorism-attack-moscow-putin-full-uncensored-youtube-video/ Don't poke a sleeping bear. Stay tuned . Didn't a little Austrian landscape painter have the same idea in 1941 ? ISIS must not be students of history. How many have failed at that goal An uncountable number of armies have tried. Only Russians can beat Russians on their own land. Once the Russians take the gloves off wait and see all the Isis nut jobs flee in 1000s begging to be allowed back home Mama Merkel and Daddy Cameron will let them all back in, tuck them into their beds and give them a bit of compensation. It is time Putin, it is time! Level the land Silly IS, they are going to be disappointed if they expect Russia's Mus-lims to support them. America ARE bombing ISIS, or so they keep telling us. They ARE involved, and have been for some 15 months. Not too sure which side they're backing (not sure they know either - every statement is confusion), but they are involved right up to their necks. Hm, gerai mūsų Grybauskaitė šituos remia. Manyčiau jie ir į LT užsuks. Kaip sako klipe kryžiai bus nuversti nuo bažnyčių, netikėliai papjauti, moterys parduotos - vaikai- vergai ir ant galo jizya - mokestis už tai kad gyveni. Tokia vat nuosaikioji opozicija ne už kalnų... (Ačiū amerikosams, mums kokius draugus užsiųs...) Tik va niespodzianka man : ar mus pirma papjaus ar pirma jizya sumoket privers? |
|
2015-11-13 08:29 #454197 | |
Nemanau. Lietuva ant tiek nereikšminga Europos ir pasaulio kontekste, kad arabams net neįdomi (gal ir nežino apie jos egzistavimą apskritai). Taip kad pakolkas esam saugūs.
P.S. Juolab sausuolis čia pastoviai rašo apie ginklų pirkimus, tai va nors atsipirks. |
|
2015-11-13 08:39 #454198 | |
Parshiukas [2015-11-12 23:59]: Tik va niespodzianka man : ar mus pirma papjaus ar pirma jizya sumoket privers? Turėtum žinoti, kad musulmonai kiaulienos nevalgo - Parshiukai saugūs. maxa [2015-11-13 08:29]: Lietuva ant tiek nereikšminga Europos ir pasaulio kontekste, kad arabams net neįdomi Arabai šiaip norėtų investuoti Lietuvoje vieną-kitą milijardą, bet kai sužino, kad čia jie nepageidaujami, tai stato dangoraižius Londone ar Paryžiuj - ten patogiau ir lengviau. Individualios kelionės
Investicijos |
|
2015-11-13 11:54 #454222 | |
http://lietuvosdiena.lrytas.lt/aktualijos/darzelinuku-klausimai-trikdo-jiems-ramybes-neduoda-karas.htm
Šešiamečio klausimą Seimo salėje išgirdusi Seimo narė Vilija Filipovičienė, kaip ir kiti dalyvavę suaugę asmenys, nustebo ir nebežinojo, ką atsakyti. Politikė prisipažino, kad pirmą kartą girdėjo tokį vaiko klausimą. „Bandėme atsakyti vaikui, kad jokio karo nebus. Galbūt jis ne taip suprato? Svarbiausia, kad jiems reikia paaiškinti paprastai, kad suprastų. Aiškinome, kad šiuo metu daug kalbama apie šauktinių kariuomenę ir visi vyrai turi tarnauti ir ginti tėvynę. Vaikai turėtų suprasti, kad užaugę turi ginti Lietuvą“, – prisiminė nejaukią akimirką politikė. Reikia kalbėti apie tėvynę, jos gynybą, apie norą būti kareiviu ir ginti savo šalį“, – patarė Anušauskas. Parsidavę mūsų politikai puikiai dirba jankiams ir jau darželinukus ruošia karui... |
|
2015-11-13 11:58 #454223 | |
Bereciu drocinimo padariniai ka besakyt. Dabar jau nezino ka vaikams sakyt. Taip ir sakykit - rusai puls. O kada nezinom. Jei intensyviau padrocinsim, tai gal ir greiciau puls.
|
|
2015-11-13 12:11 #454225 | |
Aš taip pagalvojau - gyvenam kapitalizme hedonizme. Niekas niekam už dyką nugaros nekaso. Lietuvos valstybė - praeitis - dabar esam Europos provincija - visi europiečiai... Taigi kad ginti kad ir tą pačią LT ( tiksliau tarptautines korporacijas) jos tau turėtų kažką grąžos duoti. Ar būstą, ar darbą, ar rinkos dalį, ar nemokamą įvažiavimą į kurortus... Hm, nieko neduoda sakote? Reikia pačiam viską užsidirbt? Tai net prie karo su bolševikais bermontininkais ir lenkais ėjo kariaut tik už žemę pažadėtą kaip atlygį. O dabar netgi žemė nelabai vertinga, nes iš jos nepramisi ( reik kokių 200-500 ha kad atsipirktų). Neturi ką pasiūlyti Lietuva... Tai darzelinukai jauni, bet jau mąsto - nešt kudašių ar kovot dėl šitų dėdžių rentų? Emigrantai jau parodė ką galvoja, kvailinami nesiduoda. Taip treideriškai skaičiuojant - rizikuoji viskuo - galva, jei turi šeimą - be tėvų palikt vaikus, o kas naudą gaudo? Ogi tos pačios tarptautinės korporacijos, joms ir išteklių ir pigios jėgos reikia ( kol robotizacija neisibėgėjo). Ką gausi kariaudamas? Atlyginimą? Tai geriau silkes kapot Norgėj, ten po 6 metų ir pensija jau...
O jei Seimūnai įsitikinę, kad karo nebus - tai reiškia kam visa ta karinė technika bevertė? Pinigėlius paplaut? Plėšikai. |
|
2015-11-13 12:41 #454230 | |
Skambi antraštė ir tiek. O vienas vaikas, tai ne rodiklis.
Kažkokios beretės vargšas sūnus jau su sugadintom pripudrintom ir taip mažom smegenėlėm, o dar namo rūsys užkrautas koncervais Nepykite, bet durnius komentarus ignoruoju ir neatsakau
|
|
2015-11-13 13:00 #454233 | |
Čia keletą dienų rusų valstybinėje TV skalambija apie kuriamą super-duper ginklą.Trumpas geras straipsniukas apie šią info,neva netyčia patekusią į RU TV.(ru kalba):
http://echo.msk.ru/blog/solonin/1657670-echo/ |