Idejus teisinga vertima filmai tampa labai gyvenimiskais.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9293903/Women-hold-one-board-positions-UKs-largest-350-companies.html

Women always want more representation, but only in well paid, safe jobs. The instances of women campaigning for better representation on trawlers or emptying cess tanks is zero.

They have nails to think of.

+++

Go on a large scale construction site, plenty of women in the offices, no female pipe fitters, welders, scaffolders, brickies, etc though. How about making the prison population fairer & more equal, women make up less than 5%.

+++

In my opinion only 5 to 10% of CEOs should be female. Any more than that and I get suspicious. The true percentage should be between 1 and 5 percent. Otherwise it is not the best woman for the job.

+++

Even at my work I've seen female employees promoted and given preferential treatment, only to be useless at their new role. Oh yes! Then the floods of tears. Seen it happen. Fable boss is going to change the department for the better. Then spends her lunch in the ladies being comforted by the other ladies!

+++

I used to work for a national engineering company , skilled workforce , good financial position. Then we got a female director who then slowly started to replace all male managers with females . They got rid of the skilled workforce and replaced them with inexperienced staff , To save money .That company has lost about 60 % of their customers . And are now the laughing stock of the industry. Well played .

+++

And on the whole doing a poor job. To often they make emotional decisions and dig their heels in as they fail to consider the logical questioning of staff, because they think it challenges their 'authority'.

+++

If these women had stayed at home and brought up their children there wouldn't be so many dysfunctional young woke entitled snowflakes.

+++

They are cautious of the men in their department and jealous of the women. Thats why they get on with no one. Then they cant achieve whats expected and leave. Or are asked to!

+++

One of our best ever prime ministers was a woman and I worked for a company with a woman CEO, Head of HR and department head. The latter wasn't great I have to say. Whilst they were nice people individually, women can be more inclined hold grudges, be vindictive and tend to gang up (just like they do in all-girl schools) - toxic combination - and they brought down several men they didn't like. Whereas, men can have an argument and move on quickly and are generally more pragmatic I think. Maggie was the exception to the rule. Women prefer to work with men. Women actually hate each other, work environment is extremely toxic when it's full of women. Men are needed to stop them fighting. I agree and I'm a woman. Men are often genuinely nicer, kinder and funnier - if they are allowed to be!

https://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/30/magazine/whats-a-modern-girl-to-do.html

Vienas geriausiu straipsniu apie modernias merginas

On my 31st birthday, she sent me a bankbook with a modest nest egg she had saved for me. "I always felt that the girls in a family should get a little more than the boys even though all are equally loved," she wrote in a letter. "They need a little cushion to fall back on. Women can stand on the Empire State Building and scream to the heavens that they are equal to men and liberated, but until they have the same anatomy, it's a lie. It's more of a man's world today than ever. Men can eat their cake in unlimited bakeries."

Today, women have gone back to hunting their quarry -- in person and in cyberspace -- with elaborate schemes designed to allow the deluded creatures to think they are the hunters. "Men like hunting, and we shouldn't deprive them of their chance to do their hunting and mating rituals," my 26-year-old friend Julie Bosman, a New York Times reporter, says. "As my mom says, Men don't like to be chased." Or as the Marvelettes sang, "The hunter gets captured by the game."

Women get in relationships because they want somebody to talk to. Men want women to shut up."

Helen Fisher, a Rutgers anthropologist, concurs with Julie: "What our grandmothers told us about playing hard to get is true. The whole point of the game is to impress and capture. It's not about honesty. Many men and women, when they're playing the courtship game, deceive so they can win. Novelty, excitement and danger drive up dopamine in the brain. And both sexes brag." Women might dye their hair, apply makeup and spend hours finding a hip-slimming dress, she said, while men may drive a nice car or wear a fancy suit that makes them seem richer than they are. In this retro world, a woman must play hard to get but stay soft as a kitten. And avoid sarcasm. Altogether.

Throughout the long, dark ages of undisputed patriarchy, women connived to trade beauty and sex for affluence and status. Men prefer women who seem malleable and awed. He predicted that I would never find a mate because if there's one thing men fear, it's a woman who uses her critical faculties.

A few years ago at a White House correspondents' dinner, I met a very beautiful and successful actress. Within minutes, she blurted out: "I can't believe I'm 46 and not married. Men only want to marry their personal assistants or P.R. women."

I'd been noticing a trend along these lines, as famous and powerful men took up with young women whose job it was was to care for them and nurture them in some way: their secretaries, assistants, nannies, caterers, flight attendants, researchers and fact-checkers.

Women moving up still strive to marry up. Men moving up still tend to marry down. The two sexes' going in opposite directions has led to an epidemic of professional women missing out on husbands and kids. A 2005 report by researchers at four British universities indicated that a high I.Q. hampers a woman's chance to marry, while it is a plus for men. The prospect for marriage increased by 35 percent for guys for each 16-point increase in I.Q.; for women, there is a 40 percent drop for each 16-point rise.

John Schwartz of The New York Times made the trend official in 2004 when he reported: "Men would rather marry their secretaries than their bosses, and evolution may be to blame." A study by psychology researchers at the University of Michigan, using college undergraduates, suggested that men going for long-term relationships would rather marry women in subordinate jobs than women who are supervisors. Men think that women with important jobs are more likely to cheat on them. There it is, right in the DNA: women get penalized by insecure men for being too independent.

"The hypothesis," Dr. Stephanie Brown, the lead author of the study, theorized, "is that there are evolutionary pressures on males to take steps to minimize the risk of raising offspring that are not their own."

Ms." was supposed to neutralize the stature of women, so they weren't publicly defined by their marital status. When The Times finally agreed to switch to Ms. in its news pages in 1986, after much hectoring by feminists, Gloria Steinem sent flowers to the executive editor, Abe Rosenthal. But nowadays most young brides want to take their husbands' names and brag on the moniker Mrs., a brand that proclaims you belong to him. T-shirts with "MRS." emblazoned in sequins or sparkly beads are popular wedding-shower gifts.

I remember when women thought Mel Gibson living on a beach in a camper trailer was sexy. Now us guys have to be the total package to be considered sexy. There's a reason I live in a low key home and drive a used truck, it keeps the gold diggers away from my fat bank account.

Low key home - PLUS... when the tax-man cometh... he doesn't jack up your property tax rates!
Personally, I prefer a home that's like a palace on the inside and a shack on the outside.
It also doesn't attract thieves.

Same here. All my vehicles are older. No payments plus I can fix them myself for the most part.

There’s a reason captain America time travelled to the past in ‘Avengers Endgame’ to settle with the woman of that time
Note: it was THE woman of that time not A WOMAN.

Simon Sinek, galvojau eilinis motivation bulcraper, visgi pasirodo ciuvas turi smegenis.

Nors aisku nieko cia naujo, technologiju juodaja puse gerai ryskino N. Postman, kai dar net nebuvo tokio interneto kaip dabar. Ir pagrindines pretenzijos buvo televizijai. Gal ir gerai kad jis spejo numirt iki socialiniu tinklu gimimo. Butu teke dar viena knyga rasyt.

Ir pasakė turbūt svarbiausią dalyką, kurio kažkaip visi bijo/nenori pasaskyti. Kalti yra būtent tėvai dėl tokios situacijos ir ne kas kitas. Pas vaiką košės galvoj mažai ir susivokimo kas teisinga, o kas ne tai turbūt pas kokį porą procentų tik ir yra ir jeigu nėra tinkamo aplinkos pavyzdžio (pirmiausia iš tėvų) tai nuklydimas į vieną iš priklausomybių su visom iš to išplaukiančiom pasėkėm yra praktiškai garantuotas. Iš kitos pusės, jeigu patys tėvai yra debilai, turi priklausomybių tai tam vaikui nėra iš ko mokytis ir tikriausiai, kad pasuks ten kur gatvės draugeliai juda

Tevai arba debilai.
Arba abudu pasinere i darbus
Arba dar kita visuomenes liga progresuojanti siuo metu - vienisos mamytes Tai cia isvis pipiec. Nes praradus seimoje vyriska puse, auginamas lopsys, kuris visas problemas spres asharomis ir skundais.

C#, jau laikas pažiūrėti tiesai į akis. Netgi "normalioje šeimoje" vyro jau nebėra. Ir nesvarbu mamytė vieniša ar nebe. Vyras privalo iš ryto išeiti į darbą, vakare pareiti ir padėti ant stalo pinigus. Ir viskas. Jeigu neduok dieve, pabandys kištis į šeimos reikalus, ar vaikų auklėjimą - kočėlu per galvą - ir eik sau žiūrėt krepšinio. Be abejo, kitą dieną šaukti - aš silpna moteris, bet laikau visus keturis namų kampus, vyras tik darbe nieko neveikia, po to grįžęs guli ant sofos ir teliką žiūri..

“The problem is that pc games and porn are entertaining, inexpensive, easily accessible, and reliable. Women can be entertaining, but they’re expensive, inaccessible for most men, and from the male perspective, shockingly unreliable.”
― Helen Smith (Men on Strike: Why Men Are Boycotting Marriage, Fatherhood, and the American Dream – and Why It Matters )

Almost every computer game is designed to be won. Dating and marriage have been designed to be impossible to win. The only winning move is not to play. Flip the table over and flip double birds over your shoulders as you walk away to do something better.

Games, unlike women, are easy to get, the difficulty's adjustable, and they won't hurt you in a mental and emotional way, and even if they do hurt you, it's only temporary and it's not such a big deal.

+++

Feminism has made men to put their survival instinct in front of their mating instinct. We all know how strong is the mating instinct in men. This makes you think a lot, it is scary because it means that society is slowing falling apart.

+++

Even Henry Cavil is single and would rather play World of Warcraft than attend another interview with women interviewer. And he is rich, extremely good looking, famous and what not. Women’s problem: he can calculate risk!

+++

Men to Women: “You should study economics.”
Women to Men: “Why?”
Men to Women: “Because you’ve priced yourself out of the market.”

https://youtu.be/OdXinuVbxbI?t=298

5 priezastys kodel likti vienam

https://www.delfi.lt/moterys/santykiai/sie-faktai-pakeis-jusu-poziuri-i-vestuves-santykiu-ekspertas-isvardijo-privalumus-kuriais-tenkinasi-zmones-gyvenantys-santuokoje.d?id=86755269

Kaip pasakojo D. Ražauskas, tyrimai rodo, kad vestuvės yra vienas pelningiausių žingsnių, kuriuos gali žmogus padaryti. „Neseniai JAV buvo atliktas tyrimas, kur buvo lyginamos 28-30 ir 44-46 metų vedusių ir nevedusių vyrų pajamos. Pasirodo, kad jauni, tokio paties išsilavinimo vedę vyrai per metus uždirba 16 tūkst. dolerių daugiau nei nevedę. Vyresni vedę vyrai – 19 tūkst. dolerių daugiau. Reikia suprasti, kad didelių kompanijų darbdaviai nėra idiotai. Jie empatiški, jautrūs ir turintys gilią intuiciją. Vedę vyrai, kurie ilgą laiką pragyvena šeimoje, po ranka turi visą santykių vadovėlį, tai yra, moterį. Vedę vyrai tampa supratingesni, todėl jiems lengviau užimti aukštus postus“, – teigė specialistas.

Vedę žmonės yra sveikesni
Vedusių žmonių yra daug geresnė psichinė sveikata
Vedę gyvena ilgiau
Vedę uždirba daugiau
Bonusas – geresnė atmintis

Tai vesk parshe kokia kiaulaite.

Ar tu cia priimi uz rimta, ar keli kad nesamone, kaip visada nesuprasi taves..

Tai yra tupa vestuviu propaganda, kurioje reikia visu pirma linko i originalu tyrima - galbut toksai egzistuoja tik pono Razausko fantazijoje.

Taciau nepaisant visu tyrimu, del didesniu bapkiu, greiciausiai tai tiesa. Bet ne del to kad vyrai seimoje yra super sveikesni, o del to kad boba+vaikai veikia kaip geresnis motyvatorius, ir pati boba, savaime aisku, linkus stumt savo dieda kuo auksciau kad jis kuo daugiau bapkiu uzdirbtu. Bet kad tokia aplinka yra sveikesne, ir kad dideliu kompaniju darbdaviai yra super-empatai, tai papasakokit bobutei tokias pasakas. Jie raukia mesos, kuria darbina pas save, emocijose tiek kiek jiems reikia. O darbinio arklio seimos aplinka gali pasidaryt tokio toksiskumo, kad visos vienatvines kancios pasirodys kaip rojaus sapnas. Tame tarpe ir skyrybos su pilnu vaiku atemimu, arba kaip bobos sugeba - pradirbineja vaikus psichologiskai atskirdami juos nuo originalaus tevo ir pratina prie naujo raguocio-tevuko.

Tyrimai kad vede vyrai gyvena ilgiau isvis yra smarkiai pritempti, greiciau atvirksciai. Vienas rusu blogeris dare rimta tyrima, tingiu ieskot linko.

Originalia santuoka sugriove, tokia kokia ji buvo anksciau, ateme is vyro kaip seimos galvos visus realius valdzios svertus, ir pisa prota apie santuokas, juokdariai.

Taip, seima beprasmiskame pasaulyje duoda naturalu biologini motyvatoriu - savo genu pratesima bla bla. Bet ji gali but is taves bet kada atimta dabartinio sociumo/valstybes. Ir tada kada tavo visa gyvenimo prasme buvo sudeta tenais, finiso tiesioji - butelis ir kilpa ant kaklo.

Parshas, nustok klausyt visokiu asilu propagandos. as tau galiu pateikti maziausiai 10 priezasciu, kodel geriau gyventi solo, nei su kokia nuolatos hormonu audru draskoma tarka. beje, dali mitu aprashytu toje raguociu propaganoje jau sudauze C#.

Kazkokie visi nervuoti siandien, o juk straipsnis matosi tik pradzia propagandos valstybiniu lygiu

Pratęsiu mintį - "bet jiems numirti norisi dažniau".

tai kad musu valstybes propaganda prasideda ir pasibaigia "rusai puola" visur kitur nuolatinis milziniskas feilas.

Tokia valstybes esme, daugiau nebeliko i ka remtis, tik i kova su rytais. Juk nesinori but pasaulio pakrasciu kur nieko nevyksta ir progreso ner

kuom blogai buti pasaulio pakrasciu, kur nieko nevyksta? ziurint kur tie pakrasciai. norgej daug tokiu pakrasciu, ir gyvena sau zmogeliukai ramiai be nervu, stabiliai darydami savo rutininius darbukus. na rusijos pakrasciuos irgi nieko alia nevyksta, tik rutininiai darbukai survival elementu prikaisioti...

Labai teisingai, nes kabutėse. Jei be kabučių, tai būtų rusai šliaužia. Visur kur nėra NATO. Ukraina, Sakartvelas, Moldova, Sirija, Sudanas, PAR, Venesuela, svajonėse šiaurės ašigalis ir mėnulis. Ir kam, jei ne lietuviams tai geriausiai matyti ir esamoje geopolitinėje padėtyje nacionalinis interesas būtų sukišti juos atgal, iš kur iššliaužė.

https://youtu.be/rw5TAVvweUY?t=171

Bilas Klintonas ir Kamala moko moteris savarankiskumo...